We know that having a legal issue can be very distractive for business owners. Sterling Law has a team of qualified business solicitors who can help you at an affordable price. We can help you at every step of the way, from initial idea to funding and IPO.
Our lawyers can help you with corporate, commercial, employment, GDPR, IP matters, corporate immigration and business relocation litigation, dispute resolution.
Over the past 10 years we have helped hundreds of corporate clients with:
We also advise on international commercial disputes, often concerned with conflict of laws.
What are the dangers of insolvency?
Starting a business with another person can be a great thing. A correct partnership can give your business another member who is smart, dedicated, and able to contribute great ideas to help you grow your firm. One of the most important things to do in your business, though, especially when working with another person, is to make sure to register your enterprise correctly, to find what is most beneficial for you, your partner, and your firm. Sterling Law has years of experience in all forms of corporate law, and we can specifically help you with registering a partnership, and working out if a partnership is right for you.More information
Signing a contract with another firm is often a significant step in the growth of your company, especially if it is your first big contract. In the excitement, however, it’s possible to forget that an airtight, well-designed commercial contract is one of the most important things to do. Sterling Law has years of experience in commercial contract law, and we’re happy to help at every stage of your business’s development.More information
Our immigration team achieved great success in representing a client in her appeal against the Home Office’s decision to refuse issuance of the Residence Card as an extended family member of an EEA national.
Our client, a Ukrainian national entered the UK as a Family Permit holder and was residing in the UK as an extended family member of an EEA national (her father-in-law was Portuguese). Our client lived with her husband and son, whose residence in the UK was also dependent on the same EEA national.
Excellent news; adult dependent relative appeal allowed by the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)!
Our client, an Indian national, came to the UK with her husband lawfully to visit their son and grandchildren, who are British nationals. Sadly, her husband passed away suddenly while they were in the UK. Our client had a history of dementia with Parkinson’s disease along with anxiety and depression, which made her return to India unachievable.
A statutory demand is a request for the payment of outstanding debt.
If you have an undisputed amount due to you or to your business (e.g. an unpaid invoice) then you can file a form called statutory demand requesting a debtor to settle the debt.
A statutory demand is a kind of a warning from you to a debtor that the failure to repay the debt might result in the start of a procedure in the courts to make the debtor bankrupt. This form is often used as a legal tool to apply pressure on the debtor to ensure that they repay their debt.
Our immigration team has achieved a successful decision in the asylum appeal of a Nepalese national and her spouse. According to the Immigration & Asylum Upper Tribunal, they should both be allowed to remain in the UK under the protection of Refugee law.
The appellant fell in love and married in the UK against the wishes of her family in Nepal, causing her to fear severe consequences upon return, including honour violence and persecution on the basis that she is a woman who married outside her caste and nationality.
Our client, a non-EEA national, initially obtained a residence card as the spouse of an EEA national. Our client subsequently divorced from his EEA national spouse and obtained a residence card under the Retained Rights route. The client then applied for permanent residence, which was refused and a subsequent appeal was dismissed by First-Tier Tribunal as the Judge wrongly thought the client needed to be a qualified person, not his EEA national spouse during the time their marriage lasted. Permission to appeal on this basis was granted.