Sterling Law is comprised of Sterling & Law Associates LLP and Sterling Lawyers Ltd

We are a modern and innovative boutique law firm with a flexible «can-do» approach. Our cross-domain specialisation allows for seamless solutions whether you are a business or an individual, allowing us to solve most complex problems, where several areas of law are involved.

Our philosophy

Sterling Law was created with simplicity in mind. We believe that legal services can be provided without expensive overheads and wasteful activities. We rely on technology, modernisation and innovative approach to work to be more efficient and cost-effective for you. The result: high success rate at low prices, rankings in The Legal 500 and The Times.

Our mission and essence

We stand for your legal rights, whether you are a business, individual or a family looking for legal advice, we are here to help.

We are all about robust representation and doing everything possible (and sometimes not quite possible) to achieve the best result for our clients.

Our promise

We are transparent. We offer free case evaluation, walk you through all the available options, and let you know in advance what success chances are. We will estimate how many hours it will take, and how much it is likely to cost you.

Our vibe

We make magic happen, whether a complex extradition case, appeal or employment dispute, we are here to help.

Our approach

We value your time. After the consultation, we will let you know what the next steps are. We will request the documents we need, and only call you when necessary. We are proactive, will update you on your case as soon as we have any news so that you don’t need to call, meaning you can rest assured that no actions are needed from your side.

We haven’t forgotten about you, but we believe you’d rather spend time doing something that really matters than on the phone with a lawyer.

What sets us apart?

We are experienced litigators and negotiators, who know how to deal with defence lawyers, Home Office, and others.

We are famous for achieving the impossible, be that a what-seemed-to-be-hopeless immigration case or a process against a multi-national company.

Sometimes we have to use magic outside Hogwarts, but please don’t tell anyone.

Why we?
10 000
We have had more than 10 000 clients
In Sterling Law there are more than 20 professionals specialising in more than 10 areas of law
Our lawyers speak more than 10 languages, including Russian, French, Hindi and Punjabi
3rd level
Sterling Law is regulated by both SRA and OISC at the highest 3rd level
We are ranked by the Legal 500
700 rev.
More that 700 reviews, 4.8 out of 5 ranking
from £165
Our fees start from 165 + VAT
6 day
We open 6 days a week
Request consultation

    opening hours
    How we work
    step 1
    Get in touch with us leaving your contact information and your question
    step 2
    One of our colleagues will get in touch with you over the phone/email to let you know whether we can help and arrange for a consultation with one of our solicitors
    step 3
    Our solicitor will let you know the next steps and our fees if you decide to proceed with us
    Successful cases
    EEA family member: permanent residence application after refusal 23.03.2021

    Our client, a non-EEA national, initially obtained a residence card as the spouse of an EEA national. Our client subsequently divorced from his EEA national spouse and obtained a residence card under the Retained Rights route. The client then applied for permanent residence, which was refused and a subsequent appeal was dismissed by First-Tier Tribunal as the Judge wrongly thought the client needed to be a qualified person, not his EEA national spouse during the time their marriage lasted. Permission to appeal on this basis was granted. 

    Daughter-in-law of an EEA national can stay in the UK 12.05.2021

    Our immigration team achieved great success in representing a client in her appeal against the Home Office’s decision to refuse issuance of the Residence Card as an extended family member of an EEA national.
    Our client, a Ukrainian national entered the UK as a Family Permit holder and was residing in the UK as an extended family member of an EEA national (her father-in-law was Portuguese). Our client lived with her husband and son, whose residence in the UK was also dependent on the same EEA national.

    EPC contract 28.06.2021

    We have reviewed the EPC contract and provided a legal opinion on force majeure clauses (re Covid-19) and its implications.
    Engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning (EPC) contracts are the most common form of contract used to undertake construction works by the private sector on large-scale and complex infrastructure projects. Under an EPC contract, a contractor is obliged to deliver a complete facility to a developer who needs only turn a key to start operating the facility, hence EPCC contracts are sometimes called turnkey construction contracts.

    Asylum appeal of a nepalese national and her spouse 22.06.2021

    Our immigration team has achieved a successful decision in the asylum appeal of a Nepalese national and her spouse. According to the Immigration & Asylum Upper Tribunal, they should both be allowed to remain in the UK under the protection of Refugee law.

    The appellant fell in love and married in the UK against the wishes of her family in Nepal, causing her to fear severe consequences upon return, including honour violence and persecution on the basis that she is a woman who married outside her caste and nationality.

    Skilled Worker refusal: Procedural unfairness in skilled worker (t2 general) application? 12.02.2021

    In the recent case of Topadar v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1525 the Court of Appeal examined two questions:

    At what point is an immigration application decided by the Home Office?
    Is it procedurally unfair for the Home Office to refuse an application due to the applicant’s sponsor (i.e. their employer) failing to provide additional information (without the applicant ever being made aware of the request)? 

    The Court of Appeal decided:

    Our team